Virtual space and social media studies

Virtual space and social media studies

Comparison of academic dishonesty, homework value, and academic avoidance in three educational methods (face-to-face, virtual in a happy context, and blended) in students with the moderating role of gender

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
jafar Bahadorikhosroshahi 1
zahra tajahmad 2
1 Assistant of Educational Psychology, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran
2 M. A. of Educational Psychology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University of Tabriz, Iran
10.22083/cssms.2025.541098.1070
Abstract
Introducion: Academic life is one of the most important periods in an individual’s life, as it shapes effective and successful learning, fosters the development of talents and abilities, and contributes to scientific progress. However, in everyday academic life-particularly under conditions of virtual education-students encounter various challenges, obstacles, and specific pressures for multiple reasons. These pressures include poor academic performance, elevated stress levels, threats to self-confidence, and decreased motivation, which may sometimes lead to academic dishonesty and academic avoidance (truancy), with potentially different consequences for male and female students. Therefore, based on these theoretical foundations and the inconsistent findings reported in previous studies, the present study aimed to compare academic dishonesty, task value, and academic avoidance across three instructional methods (in-person, blended, and virtual instruction on the SHAD platform), while examining the moderating role of gender.
Methods: The statistical population consisted of all male and female fifth-grade elementary school students in Ilkhchi city during the 2024–2025 academic year. From this population, 90 students were selected using cluster sampling. First, six schools under the Ilkhchi Department of Education-three boys’ schools and three girls’ schools-were randomly selected. Then, one fifth-grade class was randomly chosen from each school, resulting in a total of six classes (three boys’ classes and three girls’ classes). Two classes (one boys’ class and one girls’ class) received only in-person instruction, two classes received only virtual instruction via the SHAD platform, and the remaining two classes received blended instruction. Accordingly, the sample included 45 female students and 45 male students; 30 students received in-person instruction, 30 received virtual instruction, and 30 received blended instruction. The inclusion criteria were enrollment in the fifth grade and willingness to participate in the study. The exclusion criterion was incomplete or inaccurate completion of the questionnaires.
Results:  The findings indicate that the mean levels of academic dishonesty and academic avoidance are higher among boys than girls, whereas the mean level of task value is higher among girls than boys. In addition, in the virtual instruction method on the SHAD platform, the mean levels of academic dishonesty and academic avoidance are higher than those observed in the in-person and blended methods. Conversely, in the in-person instructional method, the mean level of task value is higher than in the SHAD virtual platform and blended methods. To examine differences in academic dishonesty, task value, and academic avoidance across the three instructional methods (in-person, blended, and virtual on the SHAD platform), multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted. The results revealed a significant difference among the three instructional groups with respect to academic dishonesty, task value, and academic avoidance. Specifically, the mean level of academic dishonesty among students receiving virtual instruction on the SHAD platform was higher than that of students in the in-person and blended instructional methods. Moreover, students in the blended method exhibited higher mean academic dishonesty than those in the in-person method (P ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, the mean task value among students receiving in-person instruction was higher than that of students educated through the SHAD virtual platform and the blended method. Similarly, the mean level of academic avoidance among students in the SHAD virtual platform was higher than that of students in the in-person and blended instructional methods (P ≤ 0.01). The interaction effect of gender and instructional method on academic dishonesty was statistically significant, indicating that gender plays a moderating role in the relationship between instructional method and academic dishonesty. Descriptive results showed that male students exhibited higher mean levels of academic dishonesty than female students in the SHAD virtual instruction method. Additionally, the interaction effect of gender and instructional method on task value was significant, suggesting that gender also moderates the relationship between instructional method and task value.
Discussion:  The aim of the present study was to compare academic dishonesty, task value, and academic avoidance across three instructional methods (in-person, blended, and virtual instruction on the SHAD platform), with gender considered as a moderating variable. The findings suggest that by carefully examining these variables and their reciprocal effects on students’ academic outcomes across different instructional approaches-and by taking into account the moderating role of gender-it may be possible to reduce academic dishonesty and academic avoidance while enhancing task value among students in various educational contexts. Like most research in the behavioral sciences, the present study has certain limitations, including reliance on self-report measures such as questionnaires. Future studies could employ qualitative methods, such as interviews, to enrich the findings. In addition to questionnaires, observational methods and interviews may be used to assess the study variables more comprehensively and to increase the generalizability of the results. Based on the findings of the present study, it is recommended that training programs be provided for teachers to help them identify and prevent academic dishonesty and academic avoidance. Furthermore, policymakers should pay close attention to gender differences in the causes and patterns of these variables. For instance, it may be necessary to design gender-sensitive policies aimed at preventing online cheating among male and female students.
Keywords
Task value
academic dishonesty
Academic avoidance
Subjects
Arellano, W. M. B., Parra, J. N. G., Reinoso, J. M. V., & Ochoa, J. F. Q. (2024). A study on academic dishonesty among English as a foreign language students. Heliyon, 28;10(13):e33876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33876. 
Azemi, K., Shehni Yailagh, M., Omidian, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of academic dishonesty scale and its relationship with time. perspective in high school students. Bioethics Journal, 9(32): 19-32. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v9i32.25728. 
Barani, H., Rahpeima, S., Khormaee, KH. (2019),. The relationship between academic hope and academic avoidance: The mediating role of academic self-regulation. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologis, 15(59), 323-335. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/jip/Article/666074?jid=666074.
Brimble, M. (2016). Why students cheat: An exploration of the motivators of student academic dishonesty in higher education.
Chalani, S. (2019). Understanding adolescent shame and pride at school: Mind-sets and perceptions of academic competence. Educational and Child Psychology, 34(3), 119-129. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/014616729521. 
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0146167295213003 
Faroughi P, Pourshalchi H, Smkhani Akbarinejhad H.‌(2020).‌A Study of Related Factors Leading to Divorce from the Viewpoints of Mahmudabad’s Couples Filing for‌Divorce in 1396-1397.‌refahj.‌20(78), 181-200. [In Persian] 
Friedman, A., Blau, I., Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2016). Cheating and feeling honest: Committing and punishing analog versus digital academic dishonesty behaviors in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Life Long Learning, 12, 193-205. https://doi.org/10.28945/3629 
Harrison, T., & Polizzi, G. (2022). (In)civility and adolescents’ moral decision making online: Drawing on moral theory to advance digital citizenship education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3277-3297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10710-0 
Heyne, D., Gren-Landell, M., Melvin, G., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2018). Differentiation Between School Attendance Problems: Why and How? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.cbpra.2018.03.006. 
Islam, M. R., Hasan Apu, M. M., Akter, R., Tultul, P. S., Anjum, R., Nahar, Z., Shahriar, M., & Bhuiyan, M. A. (2023). Internet addiction and loneliness among school-going adolescents in Bangladesh in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a cross-sectional study (Vol. 9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13340.
Kanungo, P., Mohanty, S., Thamminaina, A. (2024). Exploring the forms of parental involvement for truancy control: a scoping review analysis with stakeholder consultation. Cambridge Journal of Education,54(1), 1-20. Doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2024.2358812.
Khamesan, A., Amiri, M. (2011). The Study of Academic Cheating Among Male and Female Students . Ethics in Science and Technology, 6 (1), 54-62 . https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22517634.1390.6.1.6.9. [In Persian]
Lu, J., Tang, X., Jin, X., Luo, X., Fan, T., & Shen, Y. (2025). A network analysis-based study of the correlations between internet addiction, insomnia, physical activity, and suicide ideation in adolescents. Computers in human Behavior, 163, 108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108483.
Maniaci, G., La Cascia., Giammanco, A., Ferraro, L., Palummo, A., Saia, G. F., Pinetti, G., Zarbo, M., & La Barbera, D. (2023). The impact of healthy lifestyles on academic achievement among Italian adolescentS. Current Psychology, 45: 5055-5061. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-021-01614-w. 
McClung ,E.,& Gaberson, K. (2021). Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students: A Contemporary View. Nurse Educator: Vol. 46, No.2, Pp. 111 -115. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000863. 
Nwozor, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) and academic honesty-dishonesty nexus: Trends and preventive measures. AI and Ethics, Academic Integrity and the Future of Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387999374_AI_and_Ethics_Academic_Integrity_and_the_Future_of_Quality_Assurance_in_Higher_Education. 
Ossai, M. C., Ethe, N., Edougha, D. E., & Okeh, O. D. (2023). Academic integrity during examinations, age and gender as predictors of academic performance among high school students. International Journal of Educational Development, 100, 102811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102811. 
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1991). Motivation and self-regulated learning components of class room academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82: 33 - 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33. 
Şan, İ., Orhan Karsak, H. G., İzci, E., & Öncül, K. (2024). Internet addiction of university students in the Covid-19 process. Heliyon, 10(8), e29135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29135.
Shin, S., Brush, T., & Glazwski, K. D. (2020). Examining the hard, peer, and teacher scaffolding framework in inquiry-based technology-enhanced learning environments: impact on academic achievement and group performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68: 2423-2447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09763-8. 
Soto, M. N., Navas-Parejo, M. R., & Moreno Guerrero, A. J. (2020). Virtual reality and motivation in the educational context: Bibliometric study of the last twenty years from Scopus. ALTERIDAD. Revista de Educación, 15(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v15n1.2020.04 .
Solomon, L. J., & Rothbhum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 503-209. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503 .
Yumru Mentes, H., & Koc, S. (2025). Effects of a nurse-led play-based internet addiction prevention program in early adolescents: A randomized controlled study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 151851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2025.151851.
Yee Wan, W., & TSUI, M. S. (2020). Resilience for dropout students with depression in secondary schools in Hong Kong: parental attachment, hope and community integration, Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 30(2), 78 -92 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2019.1701544 .
Wamalwa, E. M., Okoth, J. M., & Ochanda, D. (2024). Factors Contributing To Academic Dishonesty Among Nursing Students In Kenya Medical Training College Western Kenya. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.4.407 
Wahyudi, W. (2022). Five components of work motivation in the achievement of lecturerperformance. Scientific journal of reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management, & Business, 5(2):466-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v5i2.528 
Witherspoon, M., Maldonado, N., & Lacey, C. H. (2010). Academic dishonesty of undergraduates: Methods of cheating. Online Submission. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Denvr, CO, Apr 30-May 4, 2010) https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518485.pdf .
Zhang, .L., Wetzel, E., Yoon, H. J, Roberts, B. W. (2024).Perseverance, a measure of conscientiousness, is a valid predictor of achievement and truancy across the globe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(5), 852-872. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000505.
Virtual space and social media studies
Volume 2, Issue 4 - Serial Number 8
Winter 2026
Pages 87-106

  • Receive Date 13 August 2025
  • Revise Date 23 November 2025
  • Accept Date 23 November 2025
  • First Publish Date 07 December 2025
  • Publish Date 22 December 2025